# Different roles to adjust users risght

**URL:** https://community.qfield.org/t/different-roles-to-adjust-users-risght/941
**Category:** Ask the Community
**Tags:** gh-import
**Created:** [14 May 2025 03:18 UTC](https://community.qfield.org/t/different-roles-to-adjust-users-risght/941 "2025-05-14T03:18:53Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex018/uploads/qfield/original/1X/7d3726da0ef5099a1e135505c03d2f125d527aae.png) [@system](https://community.qfield.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [14 May 2025 03:18 UTC](https://community.qfield.org/t/different-roles-to-adjust-users-risght/941/1 "2025-05-14T03:18:53Z")

</div>

It seem, there are some roles (like: inspector, admin, editor, reader…), it is certainly to adjust users right into the application but we doesn’t find any description of these roles.  
We can find also on each change line there is a box whitch one is disable… Is it for approve or reject each change? That can be very interresting to have double check and to avoid to integrate error from field engineer?  
Best regards

* * *

_Imported from [GitHub discussion](https://github.com/opengisch/qfield/discussions/2626) by @lkino on 2022-03-21T12:56:32Z_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex018/uploads/qfield/original/1X/7d3726da0ef5099a1e135505c03d2f125d527aae.png) [@system](https://community.qfield.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [14 May 2025 03:18 UTC](https://community.qfield.org/t/different-roles-to-adjust-users-risght/941/2 "2025-05-14T03:18:54Z")

</div>

We are still working on the docs, but you can see at least an intro here: [Permissions - QField Ecosystem Documentation](https://docs.qfield.org/reference/qfieldcloud/permissions/?h=#roles)  
If you have any suggestions on improvements, please let us know.

> We can find also on each change line there is a box whitch one is disable… Is it for approve or reject each change?

Your are right, this is an action to be applied if the change has a FAILED status, which means the change failed to be applied on the original dataset. You see the box as disabled because you cannot do much with your current changes. If the change has a FAILED status you can choose to retry or reject the change.

> That can be very interresting to have double check and to avoid to integrate error from field engineer?

This is a planned feature that will be released later this year. If you are interested in speeding up the development, please contact us directly via email.

* * *

_Imported from [GitHub comment](https://github.com/opengisch/QField/discussions/2626#discussioncomment-2406880) by @suricactus on 2022-03-21T13:31:45Z_
