# Inspection of 200 Underground Chambers – Feasibility Question

**URL:** https://community.qfield.org/t/inspection-of-200-underground-chambers-feasibility-question/1583
**Category:** Ask the Community
**Created:** [11 April 2026 21:42 UTC](https://community.qfield.org/t/inspection-of-200-underground-chambers-feasibility-question/1583 "2026-04-11T21:42:08Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![PackElend](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex018/user_avatar/community.qfield.org/packelend/32/1254_2.png) [@PackElend](https://community.qfield.org/u/PackElend)
#### Post date: [19 April 2026 13:13 UTC](https://community.qfield.org/t/inspection-of-200-underground-chambers-feasibility-question/1583/3 "2026-04-19T13:13:20Z")

</div>

Hello @cuprico,  
I’m pleasantly surprised by the quick and detailed response. I didn’t expect that at all.  
I feel a bit bad for being silent for a week. I hope the following can be accepted as an apology: our newborn’s sleeping rhythm is very incompatible with our daily routine. Our first child was just the opposite, but fingers crossed this one will decide to sleep all night soon! 🙂  
In addition, the days at work have been quite long this week. 😿

Anyway, let’s get into the discussion.  
I noted that some of my initial questions weren’t as clear as they should have been.  
I cannot turn the post into a wiki otherwise I would improve the description and noted what I changed.

> [@cuprico](#):
>
> I’m not sure what you mean by QWC?

I meant [QWC - QGIS Webclient](https://qwc.app/) (or Lizmap / OpenLayers / MapLibre)  
A dedicated discussion is started here: [Web portal for sharing survey results with third parties - Ask the Community - QField community](https://community.qfield.org/t/web-portal-for-sharing-survey-results-with-third-parties/1608)

* * *

Here is some feedback based on what you wrote.  
As soon as the first post is converted into a wiki, I will merge it with the others.

1. I detailed what I meant by ‘script templates’, see:  
[PyQGIS-driven form generation — modular script approach - Advanced Use & Customization - QField community](https://community.qfield.org/t/pyqgis-driven-form-generation-modular-script-approach/1607)
2. I took a deep dive into the layer principle of QGIS. That was a bit of a mind blocker. I created a new topic to work through this with a commonly understandable project example, to avoid blowing this discussion with the basics of QGIS.  
[An attempt at a ‘principle description’ of how to structure a multi-user, callable, collaborative site inspection survey - Ask the Community - QField community](https://community.qfield.org/t/an-attempt-at-a-principle-description-of-how-to-structure-a-multi-user-callable-collaborative-site-inspection-survey/1609)
3. Thers is wish to introduce a multi-user workflow (creation, editing, extension, approval and handling by different roles).  
[Multi-user workflow for collaborative site surveys with live feedback from the office - Advanced Use & Customization - QField community](https://community.qfield.org/t/multi-user-workflow-for-collaborative-site-surveys-with-live-feedback-from-the-office/1610)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.qfield.org/t/inspection-of-200-underground-chambers-feasibility-question/1583)._
