# Offline WMS - Benchmarking raster formats for QField | QField - Efficient field work built for QGIS

**URL:** <https://community.qfield.org/t/offline-wms-benchmarking-raster-formats-for-qfield-qfield-efficient-field-work-built-for-qgis/1721>\
**Category:** Blog discussions\
**Created:** [20 June 2026 10:16 UTC](https://community.qfield.org/t/offline-wms-benchmarking-raster-formats-for-qfield-qfield-efficient-field-work-built-for-qgis/1721 "2026-06-20T10:16:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mbernasocchi](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex018/user_avatar/community.qfield.org/mbernasocchi/32/19_2.png) [@mbernasocchi](https://community.qfield.org/u/mbernasocchi)\
**Post date:** [20 June 2026 10:16 UTC](https://community.qfield.org/t/offline-wms-benchmarking-raster-formats-for-qfield-qfield-efficient-field-work-built-for-qgis/1721/1 "2026-06-20T10:16:24Z")

</div>

We would like to use WMS offline on QField. For that, we need to figure out what is the best way to get a raster from a WMS and which format is the most efficient (size and performance).

* * *
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at [https://qfield.org/blog/2020/06/09/offline-wms-benchmarking-raster-formats-for-qfield/](https://qfield.org/blog/2020/06/09/offline-wms-benchmarking-raster-formats-for-qfield/)